Serco illegal mail opening not isolated incident – Kelvin Davis

Kelvin Davis Kelvin Davis

Labour’s Corrections spokesman says Serco’s illegal interception of an inmate’s mail highlights a lack of transparency around what goes on in prisons.

Guards at a Serco-run prison in south Auckland were forced to apologise to an inmate after opening and reading their letter to New Zealand First MP Mahesh Bindra.

Kelvin Davis says there isn’t much prisoners can do.

“The bars and the gates that keep people inside can also keep scrutiny out, and there’s very little that prisoners can do about it.

“They’re not listened to. Their complaints get thrown in the bin. So they’re between a rock and a hard place, to be honest.”

Prisoner correspondence with politicians is considered legally privileged under the Corrections Act and should not be opened.

Mr Davis says prisoners’ reintegration into society will continue to be disrupted if they leave prison angry with how they’ve been treated.

He says the law-breaking is counterproductive to what prisons aim to do.

“To be honest there’s probably another couple of thousand people in prison who also need apologies for their mail being tampered with. It isn’t an isolated incident. It’s just really hard to prove.

“Prisoners say to me all the time that they suspect that their mail has been tampered with.”

He says prison guards cross privacy boundaries because they know they can get away with it.

“If a guard wants to open something, and especially if he or she suspects it’s about him or her, just take it and destroy it, and no one will know any different.”

Mr Davis says there’s a total lack of transparency in what goes on in our prisons.

Newshub

Monday 7 Nov 2016 5:00 a.m..

 HRF Note:

“Section 109 Mail between prisoners, official agencies, and members of Parliament

A staff member must not open any mail and an authorised person must not read any correspondence and a prison manager must not withhold any mail that—

(a)

is from a prisoner to an official agency; or

(b)

is from a prisoner to a member of Parliament and is addressed to that member at Parliament; or

(c)

is from an official agency or member of Parliament to a prisoner, and accompanied by a covering letter addressed to the prison manager stating that the agency or member of Parliament is acting in an official capacity in respect of the prisoner.”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s